This of course is not a new revelation. However, many readers and investors do not grasp the amount of risk that may be present in smaller companies. A big part of this risk may be just volatility due to illiquid nature of stock, but there are some other more basic risks that an investor needs to be cognizant of when investing in this asset class
To illustrate the points that I am making in this article, I will take an example of two stocks that the readers of this blog are already familiar with. Both these stocks have been discussed here in the past
Syntax-Brillian (BRLC)
This is a major egg on the blog author’s face. However, the case study on this company is worth reviewing to learn where we went wrong.
The rationale for investing in this company was many fold. Syntax-Brillian makes excellent quality HD LCD tvs (brand name Olevia) and sells it at a value price while maintaining great margins due to its optimized supply chain. The market for LCD TVs is growing and the future of the sector looks bright due to a potential for substantial increase in demand in the US due to forced HD conversion in 2009 as well as increased demand in China due to the upcoming olympics. Both markets where Syntax-Brillian is a significant player. The stock was trading at 10-11 PE when it was purchased and had just finished the year with triple digit revenue increases (YOY) and was on the verge of announcing two large big box retailers in US. So what could go wrong???
Well, plenty did go wrong. I would not dwell on BRLC’s history of missing projections to the street (after all if the stock is undervalued and still showing extremely high growth in business, why worry if the analysts estimates are missed. The stock price has to catch up to the potential, right!). No, the problem with the company was (is) really basic. It is in the execution and financial controls
Anyone who has owned a small, fast growing business, or for that matter worked in such business understands that growth requires working capital. If a company plans to grow (as an example) by 50% next year and sports 3-5% net profit margins, not enough cash is generated today to finance the growth for tomorrow. The shortfall needs to be made up by external financing (working capital)
Syntax-Brillian was constantly in need for financing to support its growth. The situation was made worse by the significant amount of business it did in China, where apparently the payment terms of 120 days is common place. This means that the product sold in China did not actually result in cash inflow until 120 days later. Meanwhile the company still has to pay its employees, its vendors (who are typically on a shorter payment term), etc.
And as the sales grew, the cash flow gap became wider and wider and recently it became so acute that one of the institution (Silverpoint) funding Syntax-Brillian started the process to rein the company in by tightening the controls and increasing the cost of financing. The company, now it appear, has to review its finances on a weekly basis with its lenders and a lot of business planning discretion now no longer rests with the company executives
Ah, the pitfalls of debt financing!
It is not as if Syntax-Brillian did not try equity financing. Over the last 2 years, the equity holders were diluted numerous times to a total of greater than 50% dilution. A part of the stock price decline IS due to the dilutive effect of incremental equity sales.
In short, the company and the stock has been killed by extreme growth (I say killed, but the company is still solvent, although the future looks difficult)!
Generally a growing company picks a growth rate that is sustainable and can be funded either organically or even externally if the company is able to manage its fundamental ratios. But a steady and manageable growth rate did not appear to be what the company was after as it raced to gain market share as the olympics and the forced HD conversion in US draw closer
There are only two outcomes that can be positive for a company in this situation. Slow the growth down and steady the ship, or, become a thorn in an incumbents boots so much that one of them choses to acquire the company. Sadly, enough shareholder value has already been destroyed before any of these possibilities can come to fruition
Growth at a reasonable price (GARP) is not enough. What we need is Sustainable Growth at a Reasonable Price (S-GARP)
I have exited this name with substantial losses
WSI Industries (WSCI)
This is a company in the metal service industry that we have discussed a few times in the past on this blog. As was reported earlier, the company had announced a significant increase in future business due to new customer acquisition. Subsequent to that, the company reported its quarterly earnings that bettered the estimates and more importantly, showed that the new customer has already started to become accretive to its earnings. The stock responded appropriately, jumping as high as $11s and finally settling down in the $8 range. This stock was purchased in $4-$5 range so there is a good capital appreciation already on my books. I am holding on to the investment for the time being
The important lesson from this is, when investing in micro/small cap companies, one needs to keep a close eye on the investments. The best rewards come to those who hold long term but it is also necessary to monitor the company’s business performance for signs of weakness and act accordingly
PS: Sorry for the brief unintended hiatus from posting! Sometimes life interrupts without warning!
Arohan
Category: ACAS, BAC, BRKA, C, CFC, EPI, Investing, LUK, MKL, Personal Finance, SLT, WM, WSCI
5 Comments →
